Saturday, May 19, 2012

Site Search

Archive for the ‘2012 Collective Agreement’ Category

Voting for Tentative Agreement Underway!

As discussed and reviewed in our recent ratification meetings, please review the instructions for the contract ratification vote below.

An online ballot has been sent to everyone at their work email address as of Tuesday, May 1st at 8:00 PM (EST).

PLEASE NOTE that the subject line of your email ballot is “Tentative Agreement Ratification Ballot / Scrutin sur la ratification de l’accord de principe”

·       Voting has begun as of 20:00 (8:00 PM) EST on Tuesday, May 1st.
·       Voting will conclude at 24:00 (midnight) on Tuesday, May 7th.

Every effort will be made to get a ballot to all eligible voters who do not have access to corporate email during the ratification process.

If you do not have access to corporate email during this time, please contact the Elections and Tellers Committee at eet@cawl2000.ca by 12:00 (noon) EST on Tuesday, May 7th.  Requests received after this time will be handled on a best effort basis.

Please CLICK HERE for a summary of the proposed changes to our Collective Agreement.  Further details and Memorandum of Agreement posted in the Member Resources section of our website.

In Solidarity,

Your CAW Local 2000 Collective Bargaining Committee

Highlights of New Tentative Agreement

The following are highlights of the tentative agreement reached with the employer on April 3rd, 2012 by your CAW Local 2000 Collective Bargaining Committee. Your bargaining committee wishes to thank the membership for their support during this difficult and lengthy process.

Your Bargaining Committee unanimously recommends acceptance of this tentative agreement, which protects the vast majority of our rights, benefits and privileges in our Collective Agreement and provides stability for our membership during a time of change in our industry.

 

SUBSTANTIVE COMPONENTS:

DURATION:  Four-year agreement from January 1st, 2012 to December 31st, 2015

WAGES:  There will be a 2% wage increase in each year of the contract.

  • January 1st, 2012 – 2%
  • January 1st, 2013 – 2%
  • January 1st, 2014 – 1% / July 1st, 2014 – 1%
  • January 1st, 2015 – 1% / July 1st, 2015 – 1%

CT2’s at Step 12 of the wage scale will see an 8.25% compound increase over the life of the agreement.

CT1’s at Step 8 of the wage scale will see an 8.28% compound increase over the life of the agreement.

EMPLOYEE BENEFITS COVERAGE:  All benefits coverage remains intact at previous plan levels.

VARIABLE PAY PROGRAM (VPP):  Payout remains at 4%.

RETROACTIVITY:  The retroactive period will run from January, 2012.  Retroactivity is pensionable.

CHANGE – Article 8.04 – Restoral Call Out:  Four (4) hour minimum pay for Restoral Call Out reduced to 3 hours minimum.  Rate of pay remains at time and a half (1.5x pro-rata rate).

Payout for Restoral Call Out work performed remotely (eg. via computer from home) remains unchanged.

Note that payout for Assigned Overtime (Article 8.02) and Standby (Article 8.03) also remains unchanged.

 

ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES:

CHANGE – Article 4.05:  Members who apply for non-union positions on a temporary basis retain and continue to accumulate seniority rights only for a period of twelve (12) months.  (previously 6 months).

CLARIFICATION – Article 5:

  • Existing language re-numbered for sake of clarity.  Does not change the mechanics or intent of the previous language in any way.
  • Word “reassign” has been replaced with “rebalance” throughout.  Done for the sake of clarity as there were no existing provisions to “reassign” staff.

CHANGE – Article 5.05 – Temporary Work in Another District:  48 hours advance notice now provided to union.  (Previously Article 5.09, no obligation for notice).

CHANGE – Article 7.06 – Meal Period:  Greater flexibility for employees working modified work week.

CLARIFICATION – Article 9:  Replace “Rebalance” with “Rebalance as per Article 5”.

NEW – Article 19:  Introduction of group grievances.

 

Voting will commence on May 1st via online balloting.  
Results will be announced shortly after conclusion of voting on May 7th.

TENTATIVE CONTRACT AGREEMENT REACHED!

Your CAW Local 2000 Collective Bargaining Committee is pleased to announce that a tentative agreement has been reached with the employer.  

Your bargaining committee wishes to thank the members of our union for their unwavering support during this difficult and lengthy process.

Detailed information will be shared at the following membership meetings:

  • April 9th – Toronto (West)
  • April 17th – Halifax
  • April 18th – Ottawa
  • April 19th – Montreal
  • April 23rd – Vancouver
  • April 24th – Calgary
  • April 30th – Hamilton/Kitchener/London (to be confirmed)
  • May 1st – Toronto (Downtown)

 

In Solidarity,

Your CAW Local 2000 Collective Bargaining Committee

Joel Fournier – CAW National Representative/Lead Negotiator
Dylan Gadwa – Local President
Luc Delparte – Central Region Vice President
Ian Cameron – Central Region Bargaining Committee Member
Yasmina Saad – Eastern Region Vice President
Jacqueline Seguin – Eastern Region Bargaining Committee Member
Frank Lachner – Western Region Vice President
Darren Schade – Western Region Bargaining Committee Member
Bob Orr – Assistant to the President (CAW Canada)

Conciliator appointed for collective bargaining

After a brief delay, a conciliator was appointed to our collective bargaining sessions with the company last week.  It is expected that our next round of negotiations will be during the first week of March.  An additional update will be sent once those dates have been confirmed and further updates will follow throughout the course of our negotiations.

Your CAW Local 2000 Collective Bargaining Committee remains focused on getting a fair contract for you, our members.

In Solidarity,

Dylan Gadwa
President – CAW Local 2000

Collective Bargaining Update – January 24, 2012

Last week, the union met with the company in our second round of bargaining.  Additionally, Dean Prevost (President, Allstream) joined us for a comprehensive review of the business noting the hard work of our membership and the reasonable position that our membership voted for during our last contract.  However, after two sessions at the negotiating table, very little meaningful progress has been made.  As such, the union has filed for conciliation with the Federal Minister of Labour.

Many of you will recall that this same process was required during our last several rounds of collective bargaining.  To recap, a conciliation officer will be appointed by the Labour Board to assist as negotiations continue.  It will take several weeks for the Board to appoint a conciliation officer.  In the meantime, the union will continue to meet with the company and work towards a fair contract which recognizes the significant contributions our members have made towards the progress that Allstream has made.

Our union is willing to continue working at the bargaining table, but conciliation is also a mechanism that provides a definitive timeline for negotiations.

In meeting with our members over the past several months, the message we are hearing is clear:  It’s time for the company to recognize the contributions that members of our union make day after day.  It’s time that we are fairly compensated.  Our members have done our part.  It’s time that the company does it’s part to reciprocate on the hard work and goodwill that our membership has shown.

In Solidarity,

Dylan Gadwa
President – CAW Local 2000

CEO Compensation In Canada Jumped 27 Per Cent In 2010, CCPA Says

Ceo Pay Compensation Canada Jumps 27 Percent
As debate about Canada’s rich-poor divide intensifies, a new report highlights the growing income gap between top-paid CEOs and average Canadians.

According to the Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives, the 100 highest-earning CEOs on the TSX Index pocketed an average of $8.38 million in 2010 — a 27 per cent increase over the previous year.

It’s a stark contrast to the annual incomes of average Canadians, whose wages, when adjusted for inflation, have actually been falling. By noon on January 3, the top paid CEOs will have already raked in an average $44,366 — the amount that it took average workers an entire year to earn.

“There is obviously something very different at play here for CEO compensation compared with the compensation of other Canadians,” says CCPA economist and report author Hugh Mackenzie, noting that the substantial rise in CEO pay came during a period when average wages grew by just two per cent. “That’s a pretty big gulf in just one year.”

Deriding corporate compensation for executives as “a major driver of income inequality
in Canada,” the report notes that top-paid CEOs banked 189 times the earnings of average Canadians in 2010, up from 105 in 1998.

More on income inequality at Mind The Gap: The Decline Of Unions: Have We Passed A Point Of No Return?Which Provinces Have The Widest Income Gap?.. 11 Products And Services For The Super-Rich.. FULL COVERAGE..

Magna International Inc. founder Frank Stronach was by far the highest flying CEO in the group. In the year before he retired, Stronach pocketed more than $61.8 million — thanks, in large part, to a $41 million bonus.

Fellow Magna execs Donald Walker and Siegfried Wolf snagged second and third spots, with earnings of $16.6 million and $16.5 million respectively.

At No. 85, Nancy Southern, president and CEO of Calgary-based Atco Group, was the only woman in the top 100, which includes bankers, resource producers and telecommunications giants.

The bump in CEO earnings in 2010 follows two years of relative flat-lining, as bonuses and the value of stock options — important components of CEO compensation — dipped during the economic downturn.

But according to Christopher Chen, a Toronto-based compensation consultant for the Hay Group, during the recession many corporate boards opted to make retention payments to CEOs, which “allowed them to keep sitting in the seats and doing what they were doing.”

“That really long fall from the top floor that we all expected to happen, it didn’t happen so much in 2008 and 2009,” he says. “For that reason, I can understand why people looking from the outside are fussed.”

The recovery has also been particularly been kind to CEOs, whose earnings came roaring back in 2010 as the market regained its footing.

“In 2009, in particular, stock options weren’t worth very much because the market was in such poor shape,” says Mackenzie. “But stock options became a very popular form of compensation again, partly because the stock market hit such low levels. When the stock market goes down, the potential upside from a stock option goes way up.”

Among the top 100 CEOs, the report found that 70 received part of their pay in grants of stock and 73 in stock options. The average grant was valued at $2.6 million; the average awarded options, meanwhile, were $3.2 million.

NOT-SO-FRINGE BENEFITS

CEOs also benefit from more generous retirement plans than Canadians typically enjoy.

Whereas 30 per cent of Canadians have defined-benefit pension plans, in 2010, nearly half of the top 100 CEO had this type of gold-plated plan, which had accrued to pay an average annual pension of $1.19 million upon retirement.

At the same time, a growing number of Canadians are finding themselves on defined-contribution plans, which do not guarantee any level of income for retirees.

Though CEO pay in Canada is much lower than in the United States, Mackenzie says the rate at which it is ballooning “puts a face on” deepening income inequality, which has ratcheted up substantially in recent decades.

“When you look around the rest of the industrialized world, Canada still stands out as generating excessive inequality,” says Mackenzie, noting the findings of a recent report by the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development.

As the CCPA report notes, with earnings ranging from $3.9 million to $61 million, the top 100 CEOs are among the top 0.01 per cent of the income distribution — which, in 2007, was a group of 2,460 tax filers with incomes of at least $1.85 million.

“Although its a pretty small percentage [of the total population], they are grabbing a non-trivial percentage of the national growth in income,” says Mackenzie. “Living in a world where the top of the top is detaching itself is not good for the way the economy works or the way society works.”

All of which, as far as Mackenzie is concerned, should be adequate motivation to rein in CEO pay.

The CCPA report argues CEO pay has gotten out of hand at least in part because boards often find themselves in a “prisoner’s dilemma” — caught between the desire to cut costs and the need to remain competitive. In that context, government is “the only actor left to inject sanity into an irrational compensation sytem,” either through regulation or changes to the tax system, the report states.

Chen, however, sees the issue somewhat less starkly. In his view, there’s nothing wrong with “the level of pay provided to a CEO as long as the CEO produces results.”

Yet, when it comes to the link between pay and performance in major companies that the Hay Group has examined, he says, “The correlation is not as close as we’d like. We’d like it to be perfect. Well, it’s nowhere near perfect. We think it can drastically improve.”

Though Chen says he is doubtful that the kind of government intervention in executive compensation that has occurred in the U.K. and the Eurozone in recent years will gain traction in Canada, he says there is still opportunity for reform.

“The hope is that fuller disclosure of compensation will shine light on compensation practices, good or bad, and that in and of itself will raise attention, and change the way things are being done,” he says.

 

 

Sign up for email bulletins!